He
has been made aware of what this Company expects from
their driving staff, and with this in mind I will
arrange for covert checks to be carried out by qualified
staff from our Driving Standards Office to ensure
that he carries out his daily duties to the high standard
that this Company expects from all their professional
drivers.
May
I thank you for taking the time to inform Lothian
Buses of this matter and if you have any further problems
in future, then please do not hesitate to contact
the Company.
Yours
sincerely
Now
while I was cheered to receive a response, and hear
that the driver had at least been spoken to, there
were a few things that just didn't add up.
My
video shows the bus clearly pulling into the cycle
reservoir with a light at red long before he reaches
them. And I know exactly how close he was driving
behind me. So my initial thought on the point that
their CCTV coverage conflicts with the 'evidence'
I have felt like something of a brush off.
Added
to that, and this is the main point I feel, if
the evidence was contradictory why did they then feel
the need to interview the driver? That makes no logical
sense. And all of this over a minor point of a slight
lack of courtesy on the roads. It just feels like
LRT are trying to sweep any possibility that they
might have a driver in the wrong under the carpet.
So
at the risk of being a green-inked pain in the arse,
I've sent another email:
Dear
Mr X
Thank
you very much for your email regarding a 'complaint'
I had raised with regard to one of your drivers. I
was very pleased to hear that the driver in question
had been spoken with and it is good to hear also that
Lothian Buses takes matters as this so seriously.
However,
one thing confuses me slightly. You indicate that
the CCTV coverage in the bus shows the situation I
described to be incorrect. If this is the case I was
wondering why you then carried out the interview with
your driver? If your CCTV coverage showed that there
was no wrongdoing on his part than surely the interview
had no purpose?
I
was also unaware that the CCTV cameras covered outside
the bus, but this is a good step in the right direction
(and I presume at least therefore shows that the driver
moved into the cycle reservoir long after the traffic
lights had turned red.
Many
thanks for your help in this matter. As stated in
the original email this wasn't necessarily a major
issue, but betrayed an attitude verging on intimidation
that is particularly effective when in charge of something
the size of a bus.
Regards
I'm
not convinced this will garner any further information,
but rest assured, I'll let you know if any further
responses are received.
